PDA

View Full Version : GOOGLE-MICROSOFT: A WRITER'S DREAM--Website Overview



RonPrice
7th Sep 2008, 10:25 am
In the first year after I retired from FT work, July 1999 to July 2000, Google officially became the world's largest search engine. With its introduction of a billion-page index by June 2000 much of the internet's content became available in a searchable format at one search engine. In the next several years, 2000-2005, as I was retiring from PT work as well as casual and most volunteer activity that had occupied me for decades, Google entered into a series of partnerships and made a series of innovations that brought their vast internet enterprize billions of users in the international marketplace. Not only did Google have billions of users, but internet users like myself throughout the world gained access to billions of web documents in Google's growing index.B)


In 1994, at the age of fifty and as I was beginning to eye my retirement from FT work as a teacher and lecturer, Microsoft launched its public internet web domain with a home page. Web site traffic climbed steadily and episodically in the years 1995 to 1999. Daily site traffic of 35,000 in mid-1996 grew to 5.1 million visitors in 1999. Throughout 1997 and 1998 the site grew up and went from being the web equivalent of a start-up company to a world-class organization. I retired from FT work at just the right time in terms of the internet capacity to provide me with access to information by the truckload on virtually any topic. This new technology had also developed sufficiently to a stage that gave me the opportunity, the capacity to post, write, indeed, "publish" is quite an appropriate term, on the internet at the same time. From 1999 to 2005 then, as I also released myself from FT, PT, casual and most volunteer work, Google and Microsoft offered more and more technology for my writing activity.


There are now several hundred thousand readers engaged in parts of my internet tapestry, my literary product, my creation, my immense pile of words across the internet--and hundreds of people with whom I correspond on occasion as a result. This amazing technical facility, the world wide web, has made this literary success possible. If my writing had been left in the hands of the traditional hard and soft cover publishers, where it had been without success when I was employed full time as a teacher, lecturer, adult educator and casual/volunteer teacher from 1981 to 2001, these results would never have been achieved.



I have been asked how I have come to have so many readers at my website and the tapestry of writing I have created across the internet. My tapestry of writing which is just another form of published writing in addition to the traditional forms in the hands of publishers. The literally hundreds of thousands of readers I have at locations on my tapestry of prose and poetry, a tapestry I have sewn in a loose-fitting warp and weft across the internet, are found at over 4000 websites where I have registered: forums, message boards, discussion sites, blogs, locations for debate and the exchange of views. They are sites to place essays, articles, books, ebooks, poems and other genres of writing. I have registered at this multitude of sites, placed my literary products there and engaged in discussions with literally thousands of people, little by little and day by day. I enjoy these results without ever having to deal with publishers as I did for two decades without any success.


The last seven years of internet posting, 2001-2008, have been immensely rewarding. When one talks one likes to be listened to and when one writes one likes to have readers. It is almost impossible, though, to carry literary torches as I do through internet crowds or in the traditional hard and soft-cover forms, without running into some difficulties. My postings singe the beards of some readers and my own occasionally. Such are the perils of dialogue, of apologetics, of writing, of posting, indeed, I might add, of living. Much of writing and dialogue in any field of thought derives from the experience each of us has of: (a) an intimate or not-so-intimate sharing of views in some serendipitous fashion or (b) what seems like a fundamental harmony or dissonance between what each of us thinks and what some other person thinks. In some ways, the bridge of dialogue is immensely satisfying; in other ways the gulfs over the valleys of life are unbridgeable. When the latter is the case and when a site is troubled by my posts, I usually bow out for I have not come to a site to engage in conflict, to espouse an aggressive proselytism but, rather, to stimulate thought and, as I say, share views. And so, for now, I remain yours sincerely and I look forward to hearing from you should you desire to write.-Ron Price, George Town, Tasmania, Australia.

David
17th Sep 2008, 10:36 am
Does the OP have a particular point to make here or is this just a form of self-publicity. He doesn't appear to invite debate, simply to tell us about himself. And yet there is no link to his site. Is this a form of discrete marketing. No obvious link but the OP knows (if his search engine profile is high enough) that he can be found...

or you could check out his profile.

RonPrice
18th Sep 2008, 01:52 pm
This sub-section emphasizes "Websites: good, bad or indifferent - write a review and keep us up-to-date." My post has been a comment on "websites" and how "good, bad or indifferent" they have been. This post seemed appropriate to me, but I am happy to have it deleted if it is considered "off the mark." If a link to my site is desired, I will post it here: http://www.users.on.net/~ronprice/ This is my first post at this site--exploratory.
-Ron Price, Tasmania:lol:

David
20th Sep 2008, 06:26 pm
We welcome debate Ron; I was just testing the waters. Your post has the look-and-feel of spam about it and we often see such posts but never see the poster again.

Welcome.

RonPrice
21st Sep 2008, 09:13 am
I am now a retired teacher, David, and I post at a great many sites. Often I don't get back to a site for months and so it appears to some site administrators that what I post is spam--has the look or feel of spam, as you say. I wrote the following piece to try and clarify in my own mind what spam was, how it originated and how it related to what I wrote on the internet. Here is some of what I wrote for your possible interest and the interest of others at this site.-Ron Price, TasmaniaB)
____________________

The original term spam was coined in 1937 by the Hormel corporation as a name for its Spam luncheon meat: a canned, precooked, spiced meat product. The transition from meat product to internet term had a stop with the comedy Monty Python's Flying Circus. In 1970 that BBC comedy show aired a sketch that featured a cafe that had a menu which featured items like: "egg, bacon, and spam; egg, bacon, sausage, and spam; spam, bacon, sausage, and spam; spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon, and spam; and finally, lobster thermidor aux crevettes with a mornay sauce garnished with truffle pate, brandy, and a fried egg on top and spam." To make matters sillier in Monty Python style, the cafe was filled with Vikings who periodically break out into song praising spam: "spam, spam, spam, spam: lovely spam, wonderful spam."
-----------------------

The Hormel corporation held a competition to find a new name for their product in June 1937. As of 2003, Spam was sold in 41 countries worldwide. The largest consumers of Spam were in the United States, the UK and South Korea. Computer people adopted the term Spam from the Python sketch to mean, to include, the commercialization of the internet, the unwanted commercial messages that come in the form of electronic junk mail or junk postings as well as posts at Internet sites that: (a) nobody really wants to read/asks for and/or (b) are basically some form of plagiarism. These have become the primary meanings, among other meanings, of spam on the internet.

While some spam is as plain as the nose on your face, much writing, some of mine included has the flavour of spam. It is for this reason that I write this piece for I am not plagiarizing orcommericalizing my writing. But I know from experience that many do not want to read what I write. But that is true of the most successful writers on Earth, now and in history. -Ron Price with thanks to "A History of the Term Spam," internet.com, 24 July 2008.B)