David
24th Nov 2003, 12:10 am
I'm just doing a bit of research prior to starting a new website for a client and I came across this superb example of a website that trully cares about acessibility. Check out Richard Murphy Architects (http://www.richardmurphyarchitects.com/) and pay special attention to the "Problems with small screens" link. I can't give you a URL for this because naturally, the site uses frames. But hey, these guys really care about you plebs out there running below 800x600. Isn't their workaround just ingenious?
Should architects really be allowed to design their own websites?
Curiously, this site was reviewed in Building Design this week and the reviewer had this to say about it. "I found this website very informative , lots of good pictures and up-to-date projects, even office vacancies. I liked the split of content into four typological definitions. It was easy to follow and underscored the practice philosophy of contextual design." Strangely he didn't say anything about the structural components of the site - I wonder why.
All I can say is that if this site is representative of their buildings, stand clear!
Should architects really be allowed to design their own websites?
Curiously, this site was reviewed in Building Design this week and the reviewer had this to say about it. "I found this website very informative , lots of good pictures and up-to-date projects, even office vacancies. I liked the split of content into four typological definitions. It was easy to follow and underscored the practice philosophy of contextual design." Strangely he didn't say anything about the structural components of the site - I wonder why.
All I can say is that if this site is representative of their buildings, stand clear!