PDA

View Full Version : Adobe acquires Typekit



tomjeatt
4th Oct 2011, 08:45 am
This email dropped into my inbox last night. I thought it was worth quoting the whole thing:


Adobe acquires Typekit

Just a few moments ago, Adobe’s CTO Kevin Lynch took the stage at their annual MAX conference and explained the company’s Creative Cloud strategy. Part of that announcement is very big news for us: Typekit has been acquired by Adobe.

We are thrilled. There honestly is no better place for us to continue building our platform. But perhaps even more significantly, this represents a huge step forward in bringing fonts to the web.

Not very long ago, web fonts were a curious and controversial debate. When the four of us founded this company, nobody knew if it would even work. We set up shop in a former morgue, sketched out a plan, and nervously published our first blog post. The response was immediate and not completely positive, but we’d fired the starter’s pistol. The race was on.

It seems odd to look back not even three years with a sense of nostalgia, but the environment in which we build the web has changed so much in so little time. At the end of 2008, HTML5 and CSS3 were becoming both viable and popular. Firefox, Safari, and Chrome were leapfrogging each other with amazing new capabilities, including the long-neglected @font-face spec. On the server side, a similarly important shift was happening: processing and storage could be rented by the hour and scaled at will. The so-called “cloud” was forming.

That was where we started. We asked ourselves what would happen at the intersection between web design and cloud computing. We quickly realized we could do two really interesting things. First, by serving hosted fonts, we could provide compatibility to all browsers and devices — both old and still to come — using the latest, most up-to-date best practices. Designers using our platform would no longer have to track browser hacks and bulletproof syntax. They could focus instead on creativity and expression.

Second, we could innovate on the business side as well. We could sell fonts as a service, and use a subscription model to eliminate Byzantine licensing and usage issues. We gave designers all-you-can-eat access to a library of font families, shared revenue with our partners, and carefully cultivated our business as it began to grow.

And grow it did. Few sites used web fonts when we got started; today, new sites seldom launch without them. Typekit now serves nearly three billion fonts per month on over one million different sites, including some of the most recognized brands on the web. We host the iconic typefaces of the New York Times, Vanity Fair, and the New Yorker, among others. We’re forging new ground with web-native companies like Zynga, Twitter, and the Gawker Network. And we’re making web fonts available to as broad an audience as possible, offering integration with platforms like About.me, WordPress.com , Posterous, and Behance. And that just scratches the surface: our blog is full of examples of the most innovative typography on the web today — all powered by Typekit.

Of course, none of this would have been possible without an amazing collection of typefaces, created by the most talented type designers in the world. They have gone out on the proverbial limb with us as we’ve repeatedly tried new things. For a craft that traces its roots back 600 years, reinventing itself at internet speed is significant.

If you’re one of our customers, this announcement means things will only get better. Typekit will remain a standalone product, as well as become a vital part of Adobe’s Creative Cloud. Our team will stay together, and we’re excited to start working on even easier ways to integrate web fonts into your workflow.

From the start, our vision has been to make the web more beautiful, readable, and fast. Joining Adobe will give us the opportunity to do that at an even larger scale. This news doesn’t mean we’ve crossed the finish line. Actually, we’ve really only just completed the first lap. The race to improve the web will only get faster. I hope you’re enjoying the ride.

— Jeffrey Veen, CEO, TypekitI haven't had time to think this through yet, and of course it's still too early to know what Adobe's plans are, but my first feeling was one of dismay. I've recently started to use Typekit more, and as I've done so I've moved away from using Photoshop to mock up websites. Partly this came from turning the initial frustration I felt at not being able to use Typekit fonts at the mockup stage, into an opportunity to develop a better way of working. (This is something I intend to blog about).

Also I think part of the charm of Typekit was that it was a small, almost boutique product. Designed and run by designers, for designers. I'm sure they were out to make a profit too (as this news shows) but the impetus for the site came from wanting to provide better typography for the web.

Mostly though I'm dismayed because Adobe make bloated, unwieldy and very expensive products. Typekit is currently a pleasure to use. I hope it continues to be.

David
4th Oct 2011, 09:10 am
I too have mixed feelings about this. In a sense, it was inevitable - Adobe were either going to do it themselves or buy someone else. I think "boutique" service is a good description but it would never have remained so - it is already on the cusp of the mainstream. On the bright side, there is little doubt that Adobe could/would make Typekit fonts available to anyone using Photoshop, making mockups much easier. In fact, it's in their interest to do so - you mockup for free and then pay only when they're live online - I guess the same would work for Dreamweaver. No need to store hundreds of fonts locally.

Of course, if you don't want to be in bed with Adobe, there are plenty of other font services out there...

tomjeatt
4th Oct 2011, 07:35 pm
Adobe could/would make Typekit fonts available to anyone using Photoshop, making mockups much easier

This would be a fantastic way of working. I just think that Adobe and Typekit, other than being the respective leaders in their field, don't seem like a good fit culturally. But even as I type this I realise how idealistic I sound! I love Typekit, and if it stays as it is but with Photoshop integration then my life hasn't changed. If Typekit becomes an 'Adobe product' in the same way that Fireworks did then maybe it won't be for me anymore and I'll hop over to another service.

I think my dismay basically comes down to the fact that I'm on a massive anti-Adobe trip right now, so I'm taking the whole thing far too personally. :)

David
4th Oct 2011, 09:49 pm
I think my dismay basically comes down to the fact that I'm on a massive anti-Adobe trip right now, so I'm taking the whole thing far too personally. :)

I know exactly how you feel. A long time ago I used to use a really excellent HTML editor called Allaire Homesite. It had a really configurable interface - you could create your own toolbars - and I had it set up just the way I wanted it. By comparison, the Dreamweaver editor at the time was really poor. So, Adobe/Macromedia bought Homesite and bolted it into Dreamweaver, replacing their own editor. I can't tell you how disappointed I was. Of course, I moved over to Dreamweaver just to stay with my favourite editor but Adobe stripped out all the configurable features of the interface and I've been frustrated ever since. All I want is to be able to create a floating toolbar with H4 on it - dream on...

tomjeatt
10th Oct 2011, 09:38 am
One of my colleagues continued to use Homesite 4 (which was, I think, the last pre-Adobe iteration) until about three weeks ago! A forced upgrade to Windows 7 finally brought the curtain down on that.


All I want is to be able to create a floating toolbar with H4 on it

Very sad when that happens - they give you everything, up to and and including the kitchen sink, but then take away a small but essential tool like the sharpening steel. It's not just Adobe who are guilty as Apple's Final Cut Pro X controversy shows. Unless they're handled with care, small, specialised tools often lose what's good about them when they have to be integrated into a wider ecosystem.

David
24th Oct 2011, 06:13 pm
You might want to give Fontdeck a go. I had a play this morning and I like the way you can try as many fonts as you like and view them from up to 20 IP addresses while designing your site. You only pay when the site goes live. Prices vary but average is $12 per font/year. This could end up costing you more than Typekit but I like the way it works and since the cost is project specific, it can be passed on to the client - providing you have a long-term relationship with them.